With a bit more breathing room until the Reality Pro launches, the pressure is on Apple to make sure the wait is worth it. Gurman previously reported that the device was delayed due to combined hardware and software issues. Celoxis has a faster time to ROI than Microsoft Project. Celoxis has more capabilities at a lower price than Microsoft Project. Celoxis has a better quality of support than Microsoft Project. It could also feature a Digital Crown-like switch to toggle between augmented reality and virtual reality, a pair of high-resolution displays, and a user interface that feels familiar to users of iOS and iPadOS. Celoxis has a higher user adoption rate than Microsoft Project. Past leaks have suggested the Reality Pro will be able to connect to a Mac and function as a sort of wearable second screen for the computer. Gurman had previously claimed Apple was working on this tech, but that it was unlikely to be ready in time for launch. That’s interesting because it’s seemingly the first confirmation that users will be able to type in midair without needing a connected Apple device (like an iPhone) or keyboard. When listing the product’s features, Gurman included “in-air typing” alongside “passthrough cameras … hand and eye control and ultra-high-resolution displays.” In-air typing Photo by Tracey TrulyĪside from explaining Apple’s rationale in moving the launch date, Gurman also revealed a previously unconfirmed detail about the headset. At WWDC, however, there will be a whole week for developers to quiz Apple engineers on how the headset works and how they can develop apps for it. If Apple had opted to launch the headset in the spring, it would only have had one day for developers to get a little closer to the action - and that’s assuming the company launched the Reality Pro at an event and not through a press release. This major Apple bug could let hackers steal your photos and wipe your device Quest 2: a clear choice for VR gamingĪpple’s security trumps Microsoft and Twitter’s, say feds In case you need more information about Microsoft Office alternatives, please shoot us a question in the comment section below. Moreover, you can send and receive documents on Mac as well as other computers. Users are not supposed to update the software frequently. LibreOffice is the clear winner for its nearly MS Office-like features and appearance. Further, you get an integrated cloud with 1 GB of storage! Pretty neat! I also appreciate that it supports tabbed document editing, similar to a web browser. Moreover, it’s customizable, so you can pick the menu style you like most. It’s got an easy-to-use interface and includes WPS Writers, WPS Spreadsheet, and WPS Presentation. It’s free to use but has ads, which you can remove by paying $30 a year. Here’s another great Microsoft Office alternative for Mac, Windows, Linux, iOS, and Android.